Naming someone in a will doesn’t give them access to your accounts. Here’s what that actually means.
Most people assume that naming an executor hands someone a master key. It doesn’t, and the gap surprises almost everyone.
An executor has authority over your estate. That is not the same as permission to open your accounts.
Under US federal and state law — the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, or RUFADAA — providers are generally barred from disclosing the contents of someone’s communications without specific authorisation. Naming a person in a will does not, on its own, provide it.
We’re not attorneys, and this isn’t legal advice. If it matters to you, it is worth an hour with one.
Several of the large providers offer their own process, set up in advance by the account holder:
Each is configured inside the account itself, and each is easy to forget you set up.
None of the above tells anyone what exists in the first place. That part isn’t legal or technical — it’s just a list, and only you can write it.
Which accounts matter. Which ones you don’t have. Who to call. What you’d want done. That record is the thing that makes every other step possible, and it is the one thing nobody can reconstruct for you.
One small thing
Almost every account you own has a recovery path, and almost all of them end at one address.
That address is the hinge — and it is worth someone knowing which one it is.
When you open the app next, we’ll ask one more question. That’s it.